something like that
this, again, but god JH looks like Chuck Norris with that beard
ah, better:
and on a completely different note... [not(e)] the self-quote... {ack}
"
To at least some extent it seems that ‘sampling’ [here, purely in the form of “sample-based musics”, we promise] is possible mostly - yes, yes, b/c the ‘materials’ can be iterated, re-given, in a mostly nominal sense - becuase there is a framework, perhaps a pre-given ‘lexical’-ish framework to put those re-purposed materials in….
To a certain extent the ‘content’ of the the so’called materials has to be disregaurded as long as the frame work dictates what the content ‘movements’ are from that “giving”.
Sort of like in jazz tunes where the alternation of song-specific ideo {soon to be trope - for ‘Jazz’ say - but still one, if listening ‘hard’ enough, resultat, really of ‘studying’ ‘hard’ enough, having heard ‘enough’ [hence, already being tired of it, it being stale, you forgetting your enthusiasm} and cadential tropes {da da lat da… / something I ii V or ii V I V7/IV… or the like}
***
And are there limits to the phenomena sayable by discourses of reaseach, measurement? Does the scholar and the academy have a culture that is apt to it, and even ‘drescriptions’ and ‘meanings’ given about other ‘cultures’ still only express one of the altering alteritous relation between the cultures?
Or is any practice (techne) speakable by every other practice [techne]? Is the ‘difference’ between all practice [are one] only jargon?
***
We need to reread [Premises] again. Itseems like we can’t muster anything to Legein with/for it, even though itseems to be pushing and aim us more and more… Perhaps we could argue for a HomoGenerator without hardmemory. Some origin code and whats in RAM. Occasionally (or often if one exposes its entity often, dangerously) whats passing through the de-re-script and forget process fuzt-uck-ups the ‘source’, leaving an altered code with which to continue on… always remembering that thats how this code came ‘into’ ‘being’ in the first place. So a HG with just confused will… or even wills, confused. To shallow to take in anything but a disrtorted scale ‘model’ of the way ‘we’ (its co-infectants) ‘model’ the [what-be-calling-Manifold].
And a Homogenerator - to hazard a dead neologism, homologism fro the ‘storage’ in the Attic - who is just HG poein homoi. Who (in its whoing; “Dr. Who?”, “exaclty”, or Suessing) only make samenesses, pushing off into … just making things BettyDavisEyesWithoutAFace make sense by lumping and stacking and soaking and getting it in your shorts, like kids building sand-castles. And dead neologisms, isn’t that what that is?
And this makes it hard to go along with Ricouer’s words in ~Memory….~. There doesn’t seem to be an apparatus that is time/date/location stamping every thing that gets (s)crammed into RAM so even less as it becuase(comes) ‘narrativized’ - its not exactly like this, but this thrust needs work…, parries? yes but not hot/cold - in the/as ‘Souce’. Even this ‘narrative’ time is a reconstruction that just relies - and ‘justly’ - on the relative co-events, and phrase mark(er/ing)s, and …. Not “remembering” this though now, is just having the what/who to rebuild it later, and if I co-re-marked this moment enough (yes, I could, but won’t, read ‘about it’ again here) with enough other chaff-it-shit-ips [cf. Danielson] to have the code read this moment on reconstruction. Like how hitting cmd-i avails me a new depth (that is precisely not a new dimension, which is the entire problem of theying trying to de-linearize the word, no amount of Italicizing could implant all of the commensurate Bios (all with its own ‘way’ - despite all L’niz sez about ‘simples’) that antiquity, the de-scaled, out-of-s… that historizing, with(in)out even re-collecting, re-membering, and re-constructing IT leaves in an entity.
And this, the foregoing, is just a cannonical statement (build-out) of the problem of the shape of our thinking, the thing that does get repeated. Rework, reward, even a value, becomes impossible. Like if we forgot to Save our productOfTechne we couldn’t ever really re-create the thing that now isn’t, forever. So [and there is precisely a missing step, or an un-shorn/shown, [un]though here, the ‘classically’ Platonic one] to futz-ung with something that really shouldn’t be, and only sort-of is, would be to lose the only [philos] a-boy has ever had, folding, and unfolding, and folding [mistaken often for a refold], what came folded in the first place… And is that the problem, maybe the only one, of Atomism, assu(r)mising that the primordata was ‘pure’ at some non-trivial point? Wasn’t already m(e/as)sage-ing our rectal sphincters into us fooling ourselves that this explanation feels (w)rite, mistaking the feeling for the thing that just happens to (always) be co-occuring? co-ocher[dyed/die-ing/(tap-ed-ing)]-ring-ing…. Like a temple bowl, a rin gong, a ring-on(g) {looks like, in IPA?}, a confused “se(c)t” scale of partials, shifting, ring-ing-(ing)-{ing}-[inging].
[N.Bb. - and here/hear, Gong as onomatopoeia {“the only way [homologei]”…”Don’t (Never?) leave home ([‘om] and {abode}) without it.”…. G-ong-ong-ong, or in AleMan, AllMan, g(lühend)ung-ung-ung-ung [this pro’lly what Heidegger kept hearing, [or g(abAuf)ung-ung-ung, shor(t/ed) for: g(abAüfklar)ung-ung-ung]. And perhaps the problem with English is thinking [always by sound-ing] that the continu[ous]ity we are looking for is the most irritating nasal {ing} for all time, exhaling out the nose, forgetting to, with [which] Heraclitus to [taught us] sniff, to smell. #onesmallerror
].
And this [occur]ring-ing in ‘our’ again: “ears or head” impossibleDifference. ; Is what makes it hard to write, to right so many, [passed in silence], wrongs, to “reach out and touch”…. None of these/is means can be adequate to that [never]silence of/that being together [co]rings so much more adequately. No future for being with, the great constrictor of post-capitalist ‘being’, makes presenting de[silenced], de[sign]ed, de-sig-ng-is-ed, signs4sound feel so hear[gu]t-wrenching. Rent, Spent, and everBent. The great will of “The best part of waking up…”
"
No comments:
Post a Comment